USPTO serial 75648936
FIT 2 AIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2002
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FIT 2 AIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MUKILTEO, WA
Hayden Lake, ID
Hayden Lake, ID
Hayden Lake, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | FITTING SYSTEM FOR GOLF PUTTERS, CONSISTING OF INTERCHANGEABLE PUTTER SHAFTS AND PUTTER HEADS, AND INCLUDING A LASER SIGHTING SYSTEM, TO FACILITATE CORRECT FITTING OF A PUTTER TO A USER | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIT2AIM LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Henry-Griffitts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Henry-Griffitts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Henry-Griffitts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named FIT 2 AIM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |