Drawing for 265.FILM

USPTO serial 75648971

265.FILM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 265.FILM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Bush

DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035CREATING, PROVIDING AND DISPLAYING BUSINESS INFORMATION, ADVERTISING, AND DESCRIPTIONS OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS AND EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS FOR SUCH PRODUCTS AND SERVICES VIA AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES, BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES, PREPARING ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, AND BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 20, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 12, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance