USPTO serial 75649128
TEE-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2001
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEE-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Innovative Technical Solutions, Inc.
Williamsburg, VA
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technical Solutions, Inc.
WILLIAMSBURG, VA
WILLIAMSBURG, VA
WILLIAMSBURG, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J RIEBLING ARTER & HADDEN, LLP1801 K ST N WSTE 400KWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GOLF AND SCHEDULING AND MANAGING GOLF RESERVATIONS; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES; LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1998 |
| 041 | SCHEDULING SERVICES, NAMELY, RESERVATIONS FOR PLAYING GOLF; PROVIDING INFORMATION ON GOLF CLUB AND GOLF COURSE SERVICES; SCHEDULING AND MANAGING RESERVATIONS FOR PLAYING GOLF, AND RELATED INFORMATION BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1998 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR SCHEDULING AND MANAGING RESERVATIONS FOR PLAYING GOLF | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technical Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FOREAMERICA, INCL.
- Other trademarks owned by FOREAMERICA, INCL.
- Other trademarks owned by FOREAMERICA, INCL.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TEE-MAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |