USPTO serial 75649425
LOCO LOCO MEXICAN B.B.Q CHICKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOCO LOCO MEXICAN B.B.Q CHICKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM L WARREN
WILLIAM L WARREN JONES & ASKEW LLP191 PEACHTREE ST NE 37TH FLATLANTA, GA 30303-1769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | ACTIVE | Jun 2, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chicken World
- Other trademarks owned by LOCO LOCO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LOCO LOCO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LOCO LOCO MEXICAN B.B.Q CHICKEN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |