USPTO serial 75649611
EL GUSTO ESPECIAL DE MEXICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2815941Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EL GUSTO ESPECIAL DE MEXICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
11320 Mexico, D.F, MX
Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
11320 Mexico, D.F, MX
Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
11320 Mexico, D.F, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | alcoholic beverages, namely beer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 17, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named EL GUSTO ESPECIAL DE MEXICO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |