Drawing for EOSK.COM

USPTO serial 75649648

EOSK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPIVAK, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EOSK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARGARET JEAN CONNOLLY

551 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Public access computers; electronic retail computer software, namely, general use software for facilitating retail purchases made over the global information network by displaying retail and retail speciality products and processing payment transactions for such retail and retail speciality products; public access electronic computer terminals; and electronic advertising computer software, namely, general use software used to display advertisements for web sites on the global computer information network in the field of retail and retail speciality product advertisingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance