USPTO serial 75649665
THE TEN DEMANDMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE TEN DEMANDMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES L. BIKOFF
JAMES L BIKOFF ARTER & HADDEN1801 K ST N WSTE 400KWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL BOOKLETS, BOOKS, BROCHURES, SHEETS, AND MANUALS ON A VARIETY OF SPORTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |