Drawing for LORDOTEC

USPTO serial 75649836

LORDOTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LORDOTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles R. Reeves

CHARLES R REEVES WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET ALBANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5194

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical devices for surgical repair of the spine, namely, spinal implants in the nature of threaded hollow cases for intervertebral-body placement and fusion and attachments therefor, and instrument handpieces for surgical insertion of such implantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance