USPTO serial 75649903
HERCOMPUTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERCOMPUTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul L. Fishkind
PAUL L FISHKIND600 LAKEFRONT PL 201VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23452UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTERS, MANUALS, AND INSTRUCTIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL FEATURING A WIDE RANGE OF MATERIAL OF INTEREST TO WOMEN, INCLUDING INFORMATION REGARDING THE INTERNET AND COMPUTERS; ALL OF THE ABOVE TO EDUCATE, INFORM, AND INSPIRE WOMEN TO MORE ENJOYABLY AND PRODUCTIVELY USE COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fishkind, Maryjane G.
- Other trademarks owned by Fishkind, Maryjane G.
- Other trademarks owned by Fishkind, Paul L.
- Other trademarks owned by Fishkind, Paul L.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HERCOMPUTER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |