Drawing for THE EDGE TO HEDGE.

USPTO serial 75650155

THE EDGE TO HEDGE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DICKINSON, RODNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE EDGE TO HEDGE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard W. Young

RICHARD W YOUNG GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLAS321 N CLARK STSTE 3400CHICAGO, IL 60610

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed materials namely, books, journals, newspapers, magazines and booklets in the field of finance; printed teaching and instructional materials, namely, tables and diagrams in the field of finance; printing blocks; printing type; unmounted photographsACTIVE—
035licensing of computer software for the analysis of prices and trends in the finance markets; data processing servicesACTIVE—
036financial analysis and consultation in the field of prices and trends in the finance markets; providing financial information, namely, information about exchange rates, business investment, fund investment and asset management; customer service for others in financial and currency exchange matters, namely, currency exchange and adviceACTIVE—
042design of computer software for others; computer programming for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 5, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 30, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance