USPTO serial 75650378
MAKE ANY NIGHT A GREAT TV NIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKE ANY NIGHT A GREAT TV NIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MONICA B RICHMAN, ESQ.
MONICA B RICHMAN ESQ BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER &STEINER LLP900 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | video broadcasting services and on-demand video transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing video entertainment information services; providing access to interactive computer databases of information in the fields of sports, entertainment information and programming lists and schedules of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing access to interactive computer databases of information in the field of news dissemination | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Media Partners
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Media Partners
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAKE ANY NIGHT A GREAT TV NIGHT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |