USPTO serial 75650423
THE DIET EXCHANGE KIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE DIET EXCHANGE KIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Riverdale, NY
Riverdale, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDGAR H. HAUG
EDGAR H HAUG FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | food intake measurement device, namely a mechanical counter for monitoring food consumption | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |