Drawing for WEB-ENABLED DEVICE

USPTO serial 75650580

WEB-ENABLED DEVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEB-ENABLED DEVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth L. Mitchell

KENNETH L MITCHELL WOODLING, KROST & RUST9213 CHILLICOTHE RDCLEVELAND, OH 44094UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING TRADE SHOWS IN THE FIELD OF THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 4, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance