USPTO serial 75650586
DIFCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2735027Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2003
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIFCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DIFCO PERFORMANCE FABRICS, INC.
Montreal, CA
DIFCO PERFORMANCE FABRICS, INC.
Montreal, CA
DIFCO PERFORMANCE FABRICS, INC.
Montreal, CA
UNION CITY, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
William H. Brewster Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree St. NE, Suite 2800Atlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CLOTHING MADE FROM ARAMID AND ARAMID-BLEND FABRICS WORN BY FIREFIGHTERS, UTILITY, INDUSTRIAL AND CHEMICAL WORKERS, NAMELY SHIRTS, JACKETS, PANTS, VESTS, OVERALL, GLOVES, SOCKS AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY HATS AND CAPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2002 |
| 024 | ARAMID AND ARAMID-BLEND FABRICS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING WORN BY FIREFIGHTERS, UTILITY, INDUSTRIAL AND CHEMICAL WORKERS; AND GREIGE FABRICS FOR THE FLOCKING, ABRASIVE, BOOKBINDING, FOOTWEAR AND GENERAL COATING INDUSTRIES FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF COATING APPLICATIONS SUCH AS FLOCKED FABRIC, SAND PAPER BELTS, BOOK COVERS, RUBBER COATING, VINYL COATING AND LAMINATING; AND GREIGE FABRICS FOR THE FILTRATION, FOOD PACKAGING AND PROMOTIONAL ACCESSORIES INDUSTRIES, AND TO APPAREL CONVERTERS, FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF SUCH SPECIALTY ITEMS AS FILTRATION BAGS, FOOD PACKAGING, PROMOTIONAL BAGS, HIGH END SPORTSWEAR AND CAREER APPAREL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIFCO PERFORMANCE FABRICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DIFCO PERFORMANCE FABRICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DIFCO PERFORMANCE FABRICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOUTHERN MILLS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named DIFCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |