Drawing for A. SONGY & FILS

USPTO serial 75650930

A. SONGY & FILS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A. SONGY & FILS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. W. Gipple

J W GIPPLE GIPPLE & HALE6667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WINESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 8, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 8, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 12, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance