USPTO serial 75650981
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE B NIELSEN
ANNE B NIELSEN UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS INC100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND GAMES, NAMELY ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; BALLOONS; BATHTUB TOYS; TOY BUILDING BLOCKS; DOLLS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; DOLL CLOTHING; BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES; PLAY COSMETICS FOR CHILDREN; COSTUME MASKS; MINIATURE DIE CAST VEHICLES; TOY AIRPLANES AND HELICOPTERS; BATTERY OPERATED REMOTE CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES; FLYING DISKS; INFLATABLE VINYL FIGURES; JIGSAW PUZZLES; KITES; MARBLES; INDOOR SLUMBER AND PLAY TENTS; PLUSH TOYS; HAND HELD PUPPETS; SIT-IN AND RIDE-ON TOY VEHICLES; TRAIN SETS; PLAY SHAVING KITS; SKATEBOARDS; ROLLERSKATES; TOY BANKS; WATER SQUIRTING TOYS; TOY PISTOLS; TARGET SETS; CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS; PINBALL AND ARCADE GAME MACHINES; AND HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |