Drawing for RECEIVERLIFT

USPTO serial 75651469

RECEIVERLIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECEIVERLIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARRY E. KAPLAN, Esq.

BARRY E KAPLAN ESQ HUGHES & KAPLAN2415 W PARK PL BLVDSTE BSTONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012A vehicle attachment, namely a motorized, extensible column, attachable to the standard receiver of the hitch of a vehicle at one side, and attachable to a carrier at the other side, for lifting and transportingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 4, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 4, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 10, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 29, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance