USPTO serial 75651980
AXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon A. Dorf
JON A. DORF The Dorf Law Firm, LLP740 West Boston Post RoadSuite 304Mamaroneck, NY 10543Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic products, namely cameras that are capable of being connected to a computer television or VCR for use as a business or home security and safety monitoring system and the various attachments to said cameras including video extension cables, 4-way sequential switchers, time/date generators and modulators; an electronic device which produces sounds that cause deer to leave a given area | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |