USPTO serial 75652070
SAFEVILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFEVILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
@SECURITY BOARDBAND MONITORING LP
AUSTIN, DE
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
SECURITY BROADBANK MONITORING LP
AUSTIN, TX
AUSTIN, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin Jordan Harkins
KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS CONLEY ROSE & TAYON PC5700 GRANITE PKWYSTE 330PLANO, TX 75024-6608Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Commercial and residential security systems composed of television monitors, anti-intrusion alarms, motion detectors, video cameras and control panels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by @SECURITY BOARDBAND MONITORING LP
- Other trademarks owned by Prime II Management, L.P
- Other trademarks owned by Prime II Management, L.P
- Other trademarks owned by SECURITY BROADBANK MONITORING LP
- Other trademarks owned by @SECURITY BROADWAY CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SAFEVILLAGE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |