USPTO serial 75652278
GREAT FOOD THAT DOES GREAT THINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREAT FOOD THAT DOES GREAT THINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Battle Creek, MI
Battle Creek, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Herdman
DAVID A HERDMANONE KELLOGG SQP O BOX 3599BATTLE CREEK, MI 49016-3599Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, dairy-based food beverages; packaged entrees consisting primarily of vegetables; dips for snack foods; packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables; potato crisps; and snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits and nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta; ravioli; lasagna; macaroni and cheese; bread; breakfast cereals; cookies; muffins; snack cakes; pasta | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KELLOGG COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by KELLOGG COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GREAT FOOD THAT DOES GREAT THINGS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |