USPTO serial 75652407
INNOVENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNOVENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle D. Alpert
ROCHELLE D ALPERT PNE MARKETBROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services, namely, automated teller banking services, check-cashing, point-of-sale debit transaction services, and debit and credit card services; betting services | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |