CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RECAL

USPTO serial 75652418

RECAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

DANIEL CHUNG ESQ CADBURY SCHWEPPES900 KING STRYE BROOK, NY 10573UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029food products, namely - dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; liquid milk; powdered milk; dried milk; butter; cheese; yogurt; edible oils and fats; casein for use as an ingredient in food products for human consumption; dairy based chocolate beverages, dairy based cocoa beverages, milk based beverages containing coffeeACTIVE—
030confectionery, namely, frozen confections, candy, cookies, cakes, pies, puddings; chewing gum; chocolate; coffee based beverages; coffee beverages containing milk, non-dairy chocolate based beverages, non-dairy cocoa based beveragesACTIVE—
032Beverages, namely, mineral and aerated water; non-alcoholic soft drinks fruit juices and fruit drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 2, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance