USPTO serial 75652672
BAKER STREET TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAKER STREET TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3P4, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for database management in the field of supply chain logistics, namely for use in managing and tracking supply chain information and assets in electric commerce transactions, and for the retrieval, delivery and sharing of information via one or more electronic communications networks and a global computer information network, including the world wide web; and downloadable electronic publications, namely manuals, books, magazines and newsletters recorded on an extranet pertaining to supply chain logistics and to database management and information in the field of supply chain logistics | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, manuals, books, magazines and newsletters pertaining to supply chain logistics and to database management and information in the field of supply chain logistics | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation services in the field of supply chain logistics, computerized database management services in the field of supply chain logistics and providing supply chain logistics services, namely, managing and tracking supply chain information and assets for others in person and via one or more on-line electronic communications networks and a global computer information network, including the world wide web; and business consulting services, namely, providing on-line information in the field of database management services and supply chain logistics services transmitted via one or more on-line electronic communications networks and a global computer information network, including the world wide web | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services and computer programming, software development and computer systems comprising hardware and software design services for others in the field of database management and information and supply chain logistics; and database development and analysis services for others, namely, the compilation, analysis and modeling of customer specific data for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Baker Street Technologies Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BAKER STREET TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |