USPTO serial 75652970
EROUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2986577Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2005
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EROUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Wilson
Jeffrey L. Wilson Jenkins, Wilson, Taylor, & Hunt P.A.3100 Tower Blvd.University Tower, Suite 1200Durham, NC 27707Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TRACKING AND DELIVERING ELECTRONIC BILL PRESENTMENT WHEREIN CUSTOMER BILL DELIVERY PREFERENCES CAN AUTOMATICALLY BE TRACKED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 10, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bell & Howell Mail Processing Systems Company
- Other trademarks owned by BOWE BELL + HOWELL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by BOWE BELL + HOWELL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by BELL AND HOWELL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BELL & HOWELL MAIL AND MESSAGING TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EROUTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |