USPTO serial 75652993
AIRPORT OF THE FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2005
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRPORT OF THE FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cindy Caditz
Cindy L. Caditz DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Air transportation services; airline passenger services in the nature of a frequent flyer program; providing an interactive website containing information, services, reservation and check-in capability primarily relating to travel, airline flight schedules, airline flight reservations, airline flight bookings, airline flight seating assignments, airline flight meals, car rental, car rental reservations, travel and tour packages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |