USPTO serial 75653324
LDMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2001
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LDMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Long Distance of Michigan, Inc.
Hamtramck, MI
Long Distance of Michigan, Inc.
Hamtramck, MI
Long Distance of Michigan, Inc.
Hamtramck, MI
RICHMOND, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Dillon
Joan L. Dillon Joan Dillon Law, LLCPMB 2353522 Ashford Dunwoody RoadAtlanta, GA 30319Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [TELEMARKETING] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1992 |
| 036 | [PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 11, 1998 |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES, NAMELY INTERSTATE, INTRASTATE AND INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE SERVICES, AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING, TOLL FREE TELEPHONE SERVICES, T-1 LINE SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF HI-SPEED TELECOMMUNICATIONS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AREA CODE BLOCKING SERVICES, AND ROUTING PAGING SERVICES, CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES AND TELEFACSIMILE TRANSMISSION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 11, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Long Distance of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Long Distance of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Long Distance of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LDMI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LDMI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |