USPTO serial 75653373
UPS BEST FLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UPS BEST FLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH E SHARKIN
KEITH E SHARKIN KING & SPALDING LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transportation and delivery of personal property, namely, same-day shipment services by air, rail, boat, and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named UPS BEST FLIGHT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |