USPTO serial 75653389
VERTIGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERTIGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald W. Hanson
DONALD W HANSON ARMSTRONG, WESTERNAN, HATTORIMCLELAND & NAUGHTONSTE 1000, 1725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Skiing equipment, namely downhill skis, cross-country skis, ski poles, bags for skiing articles, and ski binding covers and protectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |