USPTO serial 75653472
RAM-SAVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAM-SAVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Frank
STEVEN J FRANK CESARI AND MCKENNA, LLP30 ROWES WHARFBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | operating system for digital signal processors and microcontrollers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed matter, namely magazines in the field of electrical engineering and computer science; newsletters in the field of electrical engineering and computer science; printed instructional, educational and teaching material in the field of electrical engineering and computer science; technical documentation, namely user manuals and technical data sheets for computer software and computer hardware for development of signal and data processing systems, and user manuals and technical data sheets for computer software and computer hardware for development of software and hardware for signal and data processing systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | engineering services; technical consultation and conducting technical surveys in the field of electrical engineering and computer programming; computer programming in the field of digital signal processing except compression/decompression software for memory reduction; conducting feasibility studies in the field of digital signal processing; creating project designs in the field of digital signal processing; computer programming of components of digital systems, for example programmable logic except compression/decompression software for memory reduction; planning and design of digital signal processing systems; technical consultation on development, improvement and adaptation of electronic systems and computer software for digital signal processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DSPecialists Gesellchaft fllr innovative Signalverarbeitung mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RAM-SAVER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |