Drawing for DUCK GLUE

USPTO serial 75653692

DUCK GLUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DUCK GLUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Moose

RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING PAP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001adhesives for applying wood flooringABANDONEDSep 3, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 27, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2002EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Mar 8, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 15, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 14, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jan 3, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance