Drawing for DIGITAL BROADCAST COMPANY

USPTO serial 75654170

DIGITAL BROADCAST COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL BROADCAST COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Stevens

SCOTT J STEVENS WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, MORIARTYBANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038delivering video and data information to products which are not traditional broadcast receiver products via portions of digital terrestrial broadcast spectrum that is unused by broadcastersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 2, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 12, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance