USPTO serial 75654207
LABRADORABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LABRADORABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W. COOK
THOMAS W COOKP O BOX 19893030 BRIDGEWAY, STE 425SAUSALITO, CA 94965Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | BINDERS; BUMPER STICKERS; CALENDARS; CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY BOOKS; CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL PICTURE BOOKS; COLORING BOOKS; COLOR PRINTS; GIFT AND GREETING CARDS; MAGAZINES, FEATURING CHILDREN'S STORIES, CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS, TOYS, PET STORIES, AND PET-RELATED PRODUCTS AND GOODS; NOTEBOOKS; SERIES OF FICTION BOOKS; GIFT WRAPPING PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Meshell
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Meshell
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Salvatore
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Salvatore
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LABRADORABLES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |