Drawing for AUDIOMINING

USPTO serial 75654465

AUDIOMINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOMINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NICOLE ZAWARSKI

NICOLE ZAWARSKI BROMBERG AND SUNSTEIN LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for use in searching and indexing a sound or multimedia recording for contentACTIVEJun 28, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 21, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 27, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance