USPTO serial 75654498
METAHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METAHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino, David J. Kappos, Margaret A. Pepper, Gina M. Lyons
ALEXANDER TOGNINO DAVID J KAPPOS MARG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR STORAGE OF META DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |