USPTO serial 75654548
DIGERATI LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGERATI LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne M. Olson
ARNE M OLSON OLSON & HIERL, LTD20 N WACKER DR36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL OPERATIONS; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR THE USE OF OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY; PROVIDING CONFERENCE ROOMS FOR BUSINESS CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS, AND PROVIDING TRAINING FACILITIES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, OFFICE AUTOMATION, AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND OPERATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Conference Centers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DIGERATI CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DIGERATI CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DIGERATI LINK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |