Drawing for JUDO

USPTO serial 75654587

JUDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SALLY M ABEL

SALLY M ABEL ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR901 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; computer software, namely, computer programs for use in developing, compiling, executing and deploying other computer programs on computers, computer networks, and global computer networks; computer programs for use in navigating, browsing, transferring information, and distributing and viewing other computer programs on computers, computer networks, and global computer networks; computer operating systems programs; computer software for use in connection with computer networks, and global computer networks; computer peripherals; network computers; and instructional manuals supplied as a unitACTIVE—
042computer hardware, computer software, global computer network technology design, development and consulting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance