Drawing for Serial No. 75654666

USPTO serial 75654666

Serial No. 75654666

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75654666?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amelia A Buharin

AMELIA A BUHARIN MUETING RAASCH & GEBHARDT PAP O BOX 581415MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55458-1415UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing information in the field of psychology and sociology via a global computer information networkACTIVEOct 31, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 26, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 23, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 8, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 8, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 11, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 19, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 27, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 13, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance