USPTO serial 75654924
SARA LEE FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2860458Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2004
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SARA LEE FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret Murray
Mary Margaret Murray Sara Lee Corporation3500 Lacey RoadDowners Grove, IL 60515UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | wholesale distributorship services for baked goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SARAMAR, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SARAMAR, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SARAMAR, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SARA LEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SARA LEE FRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |