Drawing for FAST UNIVERSAL PARTS

USPTO serial 75654967

FAST UNIVERSAL PARTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAST UNIVERSAL PARTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY NIEWYK

ANTHONY NIEWYK BAKER & DANIELS111 E WAYNE ST STE 800FT WAYNE, IN 46802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, COMPRESSORS CONDENSER FAN MOTORS, BLOWER MOTORSACTIVE—
009REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, THERMOSTATS, TRANSFORMERS, CAPACITORS, RELAYS TEMPERATURE SENSORS, SWITCHES, DEFROST TIMERS, LINE MONITORS, FOR TIMERS, PRESSURE SWITCHES, ELECTRONIC MOISTURE INDICATORS, AND SOLENOID VALVESACTIVE—
011REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CONDENSING COILS, EVAPORATOR COILS, FILTER DRIERS, CHECK VALVES, REVERSING VALVES, ACCUMULATORS, AND LINE PIERCING TAPS AND FITTINGS THEREFORACTIVE—
016CATALOGS OF SERVICE PARTS, SERVICE TOOLS AND SERVICE LITERATURE, SERVICE MANUALS, SERVICE INFORMATION BULLETINS, ALL USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE SERVICING OF HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING PRODUCTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 9, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 24, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 24, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance