USPTO serial 75655011
DIRECTSTEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2801664Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2004
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIRECTSTEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
82152 Planegg, DE
EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
82152 Planegg, DE
EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
82152 Planegg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Neuner
George W. Neuner Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLPFDR Station, P.O. Box 130New York, NY 10150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys, namely copper, copper-based alloys, iron, iron-based alloys tugsten, tungsten-based alloys, nickel, silicon and other metallic or non-metallic alloying elements for use in the fabrication of prototypes, models and moulds by means of rapid prototyping, in particular, laser sintering | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Optical apparatus and instruments, namely, such for use in rapid prototyping apparatus and systems, in particular in laser sintering apparatus; computer programs for use in data processing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Services of an engineer for others, namely, study and consulting relating to a rapid prototyping technique, in particular laser sinter technique and introduction and explanation relating to properties/features and operating way of rapid prototyping manufacturing of prototypes and moulds for others by rapid prototyping processes; computer programming for others in the field of software for rapid prototyping apparatus and systems, in particular for laser sinter apparatus ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
- Other trademarks owned by EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
- Other trademarks owned by EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIRECTSTEEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |