USPTO serial 75655214
ROCKCITY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROCKCITY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oklahoma City, OK
Oklahoma City, OK
Oklahoma City, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH J FERRETTI
ADAM D RESNICK PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFF LLP1200 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | broadcasting original programming, namely, audio-visual programs with music via a global computer network | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 5, 2002 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |