USPTO serial 75655455
Serial No. 75655455
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOONEYHAM, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75655455?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Lewis
JOSEPH D LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, analgesics, anesthetics, sympathimetic drugs and diluents, namely, sodium chloride for medicinal use and use with drugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |