USPTO serial 75655769
BREAK THE SEDENTARY BARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARCIA, JASON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREAK THE SEDENTARY BARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Altamonte Springs, FL
Altamonte Springs, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA M HOLM
LAURA M HOLM ENGLISH MCCAUGHAN & O'BRYAN PA100 NE 3RD AVE STE 1100FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301-1146UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional and dietary supplements and meal replacement drink powders | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | food products with functionality based on the composition of substance used in such food products, namely, vegetable based food beverages and salad oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | salad dressing, barbecue sauce, mustard, mayonnaise, ketchup, relish, chutneys, spaghetti sauce, ready to eat cereal-based food bars and grain-based food bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Papathanasopoulos, Gus
- Other trademarks owned by Papathanasopoulos, Gus
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BREAK THE SEDENTARY BARRIER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |