Drawing for LA FEMME

USPTO serial 75656217

LA FEMME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACOBI, WILLIAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA FEMME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A. PAINTER

MICHAEL A PAINTER ISAACMAN, KAUFMAN & PAINTER8484 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 850BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, skin cleansing lotion, concealer, cuticle remover preparation, eye shadow, eye liner, eyebrow pencil, facial scrub, false eyelashes and adhesive therefor, hand and body lotion, lipstick, lip gloss, lip liner, liquid and cream foundation, loose and pressed powder, facial masques, skin moisturizing lotion, nail decals, nail polish, nail polish remover, replenishing cream, rouge and tonerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 19, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 21, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 12, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance