USPTO serial 75656349
BRITNEY SPEARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRITNEY SPEARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI JENKENS & GILCHRIST PARK CHAPIN LLPTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-0002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | adhesive backed note paper; stencils; construction paper; rubbing boards and modeling clay; bookmarks; coloring books; picture books; erasers; iron transfer; lithographs; music and lyric sheets; fan magazines; art and craft paint kits; paper party decorations; pre-paid phone cards; rubber stamps; drawing rulers; binders w/CD-Roms; drawing sets w/finger paints; poster paints; crayons; colored pencils and chalk and paint books | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | beachwear; footwear; dresses; gloves; jeans; mittens; coats; vests; fleece tops; pants; scarves; blouses; shorts; skirts; sweatpants; hosiery and socks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |