USPTO serial 75656469
MP3.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MP3.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK C. HORNOR
MARK C HORNOR MP3.COM, INC4790 EASTGATE MALLSAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |