USPTO serial 75656759
POWER NUMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWER NUMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter W. Becker
PETER W BECKER REINHART, BOERNER, VAN DEURENNORRIS & RIESELBACH SC1000 N WATER ST STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, providing electronic mail, multiple-user access to a global computer information network, network conferencing, facsimile transmission, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage, and subsequent transmission of voice message by telephone, electronic voice generation, namely, automated attendants to monitor and answer telephone calls, telephone communication, and call forwarding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POWERCOM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by POWERCOM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TCC Communications Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named POWER NUMBER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |