USPTO serial 75656794
BROW CORRECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2000
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BROW CORRECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
AZUSA, CA
Other trademarks owned by PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
AZUSA, CA
Other trademarks owned by PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
AZUSA, CA
Other trademarks owned by PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONNA A. RUBELMANN
DONNA A RUBELMANN RUBELMANN & ASSOCIATES501 HERONDO ST STE 45HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, EYEBROW GEL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 16, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BROW CORRECTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |