Drawing for CORE TECHNOLOGY INC.

USPTO serial 75657170

CORE TECHNOLOGY INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORE TECHNOLOGY INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon A. Dorf

JON A. DORF The Dorf Law Firm, LLP740 West Boston Post RoadSuite 304Mamaroneck, NY 10543

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Selling and manufacturing of various electronic products, namely cameras that are capable of being connected to a computer, television or VCR for use as a business or home security and safety monitoring system and the various attachments to said cameras including video extension cables, 4-way sequential switchers, time/date generators and modulators, as well as well as a device which produces sounds that cause deer to leave a given areaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance