USPTO serial 75657194
MALLTITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MALLTITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Regina S4P 3Y2 Saskatchewan, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen H. Sorensen
KRISTEN H SORENSEN HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVE43TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10166-0136Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |